Important information: The value of investments and the income from them, can go down as well as up, so you may get back less than you invest.

One of the enduring myths about sustainable investing is that doing good comes at a price. You can have a clean conscience or investment gains, but not both at the same time. At Fidelity, we believe this is simply not the case.

We think that investing in a sustainable way can go hand in hand with achieving your financial goals. In fact, we’d go further, and say that investing in companies that rate highly on environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors is one of the best ways to reach your financial destination.

To test our hypothesis, we conducted a performance comparison across all 2,659 companies covered by Fidelity’s equity analysts and 1,450 in our fixed income universe.

It was a simple test. We rank the companies we follow on the basis of their ESG merits, so it was an easy enough job to see whether stock market performance was correlated to our A-E rating system.

We conducted our analysis in October 2020 using data for the first nine months of the year and we were delighted, although not altogether surprised, to see that the most highly-rated companies performed best, followed by the second most highly-rated group and so on, all the way down to the worst-rated and worst-performing category.

The correlation was linear. Each group beat the one below it, from A down to E.

The top-rated A and B groups also beat the lowest rated D and E categories in each of the nine months except one, and even that exception proved rather than undermined our central claim.

That’s because the outlier was April, the month in which markets bounced back most strongly from the heavy falls experienced in February and March. Very often, when a market recovers from a big sell-off, it is the lowest-quality shares which bounce fastest because they have been hardest hit in the downturn.

So, all nine months in the study confirmed the apparent link between strong environmental, social and governance scores and good management. Sustainability does seem to be a kind of proxy for quality.

This correlation actually poses a tricky question. It suggests that maybe the real reason for the outperformance is not a company’s ESG credentials but simply its quality. If that is the case, then we might simply be confusing correlation with causation.

To settle that question, we sliced and diced our universe of companies another way. This time we collected the companies in five buckets on the basis of their return on equity (a shorthand for quality). Then, within each of these groups, we did the same ESG ranking. We found, to our relief, that whichever quality bucket you chose, the link between ESG rating and stock market performance held true.

One other thing Fidelity analysts do when looking at companies is to decide whether their ESG qualities are improving, staying the same or deteriorating. We wondered whether this might be a predictor of performance too. And, sure enough, we found that companies with an improving ESG profile outperformed stable ones which in turn outperformed those where attention to environmental, social and governance factors is getting worse.

By the way, we found a similar effect when we looked at bond performance and ESG ratings. The correlation was not quite as strong as it is with shares, but the evidence is still compelling.

This analysis is powerful because it appears to have worked in both down and up markets in 2020. Regardless of whether investors find themselves in a bull or a bear market, focusing on companies that take sustainability seriously pays dividends. The market seems to discriminate between companies based on their approach to ESG.

This is not just an argument for investing in funds with an explicit sustainability focus. It is also an argument for backing investment firms with a track record of integrating ESG factors into their analytical approach.

In the extraordinary market conditions of 2020, you might have thought that sustainability was a luxury you could do without, putting environmental concerns, stakeholder welfare and corporate governance on the back burner to focus instead on maximising profits, whatever the cost. In fact, the reverse is the case. Doing the right thing makes good investment sense too.

More on Sustainable and ESG investing

Important information: Investors should note that the views expressed may no longer be current and may have already been acted upon. There is a risk that the issuers of bonds may not be able to repay the money they have borrowed or make interest payments. When interest rates rise, bonds may fall in value. Rising interest rates may cause the value of your investment to fall. This information is not a personal recommendation for any particular investment. If you are unsure about the suitability of an investment you should speak to an authorised financial adviser.

Topics covered:

Funds; ESG investing; Active investing

Latest articles

Where next for Kingfisher shares as Screwfix-owner gives update?

Can the lockdown DIY frenzy sales boom persist in a re-opened world?


Emma-Lou Montgomery

Emma-Lou Montgomery

Fidelity International

Stop worrying about a crash: the bull market has further to run

Should investors really worry about inflation, Covid and US tapering?


Tom Stevenson

Tom Stevenson

Fidelity International

Where did UK consumers spend their money in August?

The UK ventured out last month as retail sales fell


Graham Smith

Graham Smith

Investment writer