Important information - investment values and income from investments can go down as well as up, so you may get back less than you invest.
Q: It was very interesting to read of the dilemma the government faces with the State Pension rising above the Personal Allowance. A solution occurs to me that appears straightforward, but I wonder if you could explore the implications.
Why not permanently tie the State Pension and Personal Allowance together, making them the same, and rising equally in future. Apart from needing to end the triple lock to make this affordable, it seems easy enough to do. What do you think?
A: Thanks for your question. There has been great interest in this issue ever since it became clear that the Triple Lock would push the State Pension above the level of the Personal Allowance - the amount you can earn before income tax is payable.
The State Pension is now expected to rise by 3.9% next year. That’s this year’s figure for annual wage growth, the fastest-rising of the three measures (along with CPI inflation and 2.5%) that comprise the Triple Lock. It will take the full new State Pension to an expected £13,036.40 a year from April.
That exceeds the £12,570 Personal Allowance - meaning a small amount of State Pension above this level will be liable for tax. We discussed what a headache this causes for the government on a recent episode of the Personal Investor podcast.
The question is - what, if anything, should be done to avoid this? Your suggested solution is to tie the full State Pension and the Personal Allowance together, then raise them by the same amount. That would solve the issue of the State Pension exceeding the Personal Allowance. But what other challenges would such a reform face?
The first is that the successive governments have become quite fond of not increasing the Personal Allowance as a stealthy way to raise tax - and raise lots of it. That happened first under Rishi Sunak’s Conservatives in 2021 but was continued and extended under Keir Starmer’s Labour in 2024. The Personal Allowance, and other thresholds for income tax, have been frozen until 2031.
The Office for Budget Responsibility has forecast that the freeze in tax thresholds (both the Personal Allowance and the 40% higher-rate threshold) will bring in an extra £66.6bn by 2031.1 So inflation-linking the Personal Allowance would first mean a significant tax cut that the government would have to budget for.
A second challenge is choosing whether to raise the State Pension and Personal Allowance by inflation or wage growth. Limiting State Pension increases to inflation alone is likely to be very unpopular, rightly or wrongly. Over long periods, wage rises have tended to exceed inflation, and a strong sense pervades that pensioners should not see their living standards fall relative to those of working people. As such, linking the State Pension to average earnings is often seen as the minimum required and if the Triple Lock were ever to be scrapped and only one measure retained, it would likely be wage growth.
But that would mean increasing the Personal Allowance by wages as well, which is likely to prove very expensive. The Institute of Fiscal Studies has said that every £100 rise in the Personal Allowance costs the Treasury £800m over the long term2 which is perhaps why rises to tax thresholds have tended to be linked to slower-rising CPI inflation instead.
None of this is to say, however, that yours is a bad or impossible idea - it has as much merit as any of the solutions put forward elsewhere.
For example, the path of least resistance may lead the government to simply waive any tax owed by those living only on the State Pension. That will look sensible at first when the amounts are low but will get very costly as higher amounts fall above the Personal Allowance in future years. And would other pensioners who get a private pension - and who can therefore be taxed on this money - also be let off the tax?
- Refer a friend and you’ll both receive a £100 Amazon.co.uk gift card when they invest £5,000 or more in a qualifying account. T&Cs and exclusions apply. Find out more
Alternatively, the government could introduce a special Personal Allowance just for pensioners which rises with the Triple Lock. This was the policy of the Conservative party which lost the last election. This might solve the problem but would extend issues we see with the Triple Lock (namely, it’s exponentially rising cost) to the Personal Allowance for a growing chunk of the population.
Or the government could bite the bullet and build a massive system to apply tax codes to those receiving only the State Pension and make them pay the tax. That might prove the most cost-effective route eventually but would be exceedingly costly and unpopular in the short term.
With a Budget due next month, the last before tax on State Pension income begins to accrue from next April, we shouldn’t have long to wait before a path is chosen.
Got a burning question you want to ask? Why not drop us a line. Click here to ask your question.
- Read: The overlooked retirement asset: your ability to keep earning
- Read: How to invest like a SIPP millionaire
- Read: Should you use your pension to pay off your mortgage?
Source:
1 Office for Budget Responsibility Economic and fiscal outlook, November 2025
2 IFS Unfreezing the personal allowance, 4 August 2026
Important information - investors should note that the views expressed may no longer be current and may have already been acted upon. Tax treatment investors should note that the views expressed may no longer be current and may have already been acted upon. This information is not a personal recommendation for any particular investment. SIPP eligibility and tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and tax rules may change. You cannot normally access money in a pension until age 55 (57 from 2028). If you are unsure about the suitability of an investment you should speak to one of Fidelity’s advisers or an authorised financial adviser of your choice.
Share this article